You would use it any time the relationship means something different. It
would generally be inappropriate to use it as a simple backwards
relationship (Django does this for you), but there's no reason not to have
multiple relationships in a number of directions. In an HR system, someone
could be bo
On 2016-02-19 07:29, Eddilbert Macharia wrote:
> Hello vadim when would such a relationship be needed I'm curious
Think of a hierarchy at a company. Most employees have a
supervisor. So your table would reference the supervisor in the same
table:
class Employee(models.Model):
name = ...
Hello vadim when would such a relationship be needed I'm curious
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To p
Why should it be complained? I know a lot of the same cases that may be
applied.
пятница, 19 февраля 2016 г., 15:00:12 UTC+2 пользователь Eddilbert Macharia
написал:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I was working on a project, and realized that Django does not complain
> when you create Circular Model relati
On 19 February 2016 at 13:00, Eddilbert Macharia wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was working on a project, and realized that Django does not complain when
> you create Circular Model relationship even when creating migrations where i
> expected to have this complain
why would it complain? it might be
Hello All,
I was working on a project, and realized that Django does not complain when
you create Circular Model relationship even when creating migrations where
i expected to have this complain
e.g. the example does not make any sense as far as relationships go but it
makes my point.
class
6 matches
Mail list logo