That's what the original motivation for it was, rapid prototyping. But
also because for a specific application I needed a
richly-relationshipped (tm) model, and one that does some heavy
processing on many related objects, and one (with its data) that can be
easily adapted and evolved. I thoug
Tom Tobin wrote:
> On 11/20/05, bruno modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Only data are saved to the zodb.
>
>
> But you're still working with it solely in the form of a Python object
Which is exactly what I want.
> (with aforementioned methods and all). With a SQL DB, you can access
> th
mario ruggier wrote:
>
> Greeting everyone...
>
> Yes, i'd be curious too! I see MVC and OODB/SQLDB as completely
> orthogonal concepts.
And you're right of course !-)
(snip the rest - thank for the links to moellus, I didn't knew this
project).
--
bruno desthuilliers
développeur
[EMAIL PROT
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Sunday 20 Nov 2005 6:06 pm, bruno modulix wrote:
>
>>>and the reason i switched from zope/plone to django is because i
>>>wanted to use postgresql
>>
>>I use PostgreSQL with Zope (when appropriate) without any problem.
>
>
> sql storage with archetypes adds two ext
On Sunday 20 Nov 2005 6:06 pm, bruno modulix wrote:
> > and the reason i switched from zope/plone to django is because i
> > wanted to use postgresql
>
> I use PostgreSQL with Zope (when appropriate) without any problem.
sql storage with archetypes adds two extra fields in each table - which
is
On 11/20/05, bruno modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only data are saved to the zodb.
But you're still working with it solely in the form of a Python object
(with aforementioned methods and all). With a SQL DB, you can access
that data in a variety of ways, move it to a different database
imp
Adrian Holovaty a écrit :
On 11/19/05, bruno de chez modulix en face <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I made a quick search (google, the Django wiki, this group...) on the
topic (Django +zodb) but did not found anythink relevant. Did anyone
ever tried ? Any pointer ?
This has never been tried, to
Tom Tobin a écrit :
On 11/20/05, Cheng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am curious to learn more about why "object DBs are not good fit for
the MVC-like separation". Previously I had very basic exposure to
ZODB, along with the concept of object database, when I played with
Zope a bit years a
On 11/20/05, Cheng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am curious to learn more about why "object DBs are not good fit for
> the MVC-like separation". Previously I had very basic exposure to
> ZODB, along with the concept of object database, when I played with
> Zope a bit years ago.
Because w
Informative pointer!
I read the introduction of Moellus. Seems to me that it offers a even
quicker way of rapid prototyping. When we frequently change the model
during cycles of rapid prototyping, there is no need to manually
alter the tables in RDB to make it consistent with the model over
Kenneth Gonsalves a écrit :
On Sunday 20 Nov 2005 10:42 am, Tom Tobin wrote:
On 11/19/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has never been tried, to my knowledge. It would be possible --
and relatively easy -- to do if there were a DB-API-compliant ZODB
library. Is there one? I
Tom Tobin a écrit :
On 11/19/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has never been tried, to my knowledge. It would be possible --
and relatively easy -- to do if there were a DB-API-compliant ZODB
library. Is there one? I know nothing about ZODB, other than the fact
that it's ass
Greeting everyone...
Yes, i'd be curious too! I see MVC and OODB/SQLDB as completely
orthogonal concepts.
Plus, if I may add, the distinction between OODB and relational can in
practice not always be so clear. In fact I know of two efforts that try
to combine the benefits of both these worl
I am curious to learn more about why "object DBs are not good fit for
the MVC-like separation". Previously I had very basic exposure to
ZODB, along with the concept of object database, when I played with
Zope a bit years ago.
Thanks.
- Cheng
On Nov 20, 2005, at 1:12 PM, Tom Tobin wrote:
On Sunday 20 Nov 2005 10:42 am, Tom Tobin wrote:
> On 11/19/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This has never been tried, to my knowledge. It would be possible --
> > and relatively easy -- to do if there were a DB-API-compliant ZODB
> > library. Is there one? I know nothing about
On 11/19/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has never been tried, to my knowledge. It would be possible --
> and relatively easy -- to do if there were a DB-API-compliant ZODB
> library. Is there one? I know nothing about ZODB, other than the fact
> that it's associated with Zop
On 11/19/05, bruno de chez modulix en face <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a quick search (google, the Django wiki, this group...) on the
> topic (Django +zodb) but did not found anythink relevant. Did anyone
> ever tried ? Any pointer ?
This has never been tried, to my knowledge. It would be
On Saturday 19 Nov 2005 7:42 pm, bruno de chez modulix en face wrote:
> I made a quick search (google, the Django wiki, this group...) on the
> topic (Django +zodb) but did not found anythink relevant
it shows that people have inherrent good sense
--
regards
kg
http://www.livejournal.com/users
Jesus Christ, why would you want to use ZODB as a backend if you're
not using Zope? The mind boggles ;)
The closest thing I have seen is my own Django-Zope bridge, but that
is more for pulling HTML generated by Django into a Zope-driven
interface, and does not deal with the ZODB directly
Hi
I made a quick search (google, the Django wiki, this group...) on the
topic (Django +zodb) but did not found anythink relevant. Did anyone
ever tried ? Any pointer ?
TIA
20 matches
Mail list logo
