Hi Guys,
I've just added a section to http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoResources
to list these pluggable re-usable components - please add any others
that you know of.
I think we should keep the distinction that Django makes between
"apps" and "projects", where an app is something that y
[Sorry for this late e-mail, I'm catching up with a mail backlog]
On vr, 2007-02-16 at 17:42 +, James Tauber wrote:
> Another aspect of this proposed "Hot Club of France" site would be a
> catalog of open-source sites.
If anyone ever makes such a site, then at least name it "Hot Club de
Fr
No reason at all. In fact, I'd encourage the apps to be listed on
Cheeseshop. But I think the real value would be the conventions for
making sure the apps "jam well together".
James
On 16/02/2007, at 12:14 AM, Nathan R. Yergler wrote:
>
> Is there a reason *not* to use the Cheeseshop, and
On 16/02/2007, at 1:46 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On 2/15/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That would be great. In fact, it would be nice if many of the
>> component apps of the site were themselves available on the site for
>> building other software component catalog sites.
>
>
On 2/16/07, mamcxyz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Other hard points is what to do with common "modules".
>
> For example, I made my own CMS. Then I wanna get Schatmo. Both have
> custom-extended user modesl, but both are diferent. Also city,
> country, etc...
>
> This is a hard problem. Because i
Other hard points is what to do with common "modules".
For example, I made my own CMS. Then I wanna get Schatmo. Both have
custom-extended user modesl, but both are diferent. Also city,
country, etc...
This is a hard problem. Because is necesary get rid of one of them,
merge both or simply deny
On 2/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently working on a "DjangoForge" type of site right now. I've
> been working on it for the past few weeks with any spare time that
> I've had. It's definitely not ready for public consumption yet, but
> it's coming a
Hello,
I'm currently working on a "DjangoForge" type of site right now. I've
been working on it for the past few weeks with any spare time that
I've had. It's definitely not ready for public consumption yet, but
it's coming along very nicely and I think that more than a few people
will find it
On 2/16/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/15/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That would be great. In fact, it would be nice if many of the
> > component apps of the site were themselves available on the site for
> > building other software component catalog site
On 2/15/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be great. In fact, it would be nice if many of the
> component apps of the site were themselves available on the site for
> building other software component catalog sites.
Absolutely. I'm a fan of open-source sites (hopefully going
Is there a reason *not* to use the Cheeseshop, and utilize the
metadata framework it provides? For example, Zope Corp publishes
Zope-specific pieces there and marks them as "Framework:Zope" (or
something like that... don't recall exactly). This makes the packages
available to setuptools enabled
On 15/02/2007, at 8:48 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On 2/15/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has anyone give much thought to building a "Cheeseshop" for reusable
>> Django apps?
>
> A couple people have tried to start sourceforge-esque sites for
> hosting Django apps, but so far non
On 2/15/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone give much thought to building a "Cheeseshop" for reusable
> Django apps?
A couple people have tried to start sourceforge-esque sites for
hosting Django apps, but so far none of them have taken off.
Personally, I've just been using G
Has anyone give much thought to building a "Cheeseshop" for reusable
Django apps?
I have a bunch of ideas but want to check what's been done already.
I'm thinking it could be a two-tiered catalog: one tier accepting all
submissions, the other tier being more constrained to apps that
follo
14 matches
Mail list logo
