On Feb 12, 3:29 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
>
> > My apologies... I didn't see Alex's post. Google some times collapses
> > threads on me. Replacing % with %% seemed to work. It queries the
> > database and returns a dataset like this:
>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
>
> My apologies... I didn't see Alex's post. Google some times collapses
> threads on me. Replacing % with %% seemed to work. It queries the
> database and returns a dataset like this:
>
> ((6L, u'WI', u'ST', u'test3', u'test3', u'test3',
> but I'm not entirely sure of that since you still haven't provided the
> actual traceback which would show what code, exactly, is running into
> trouble. Without the traceback I have to fall back on my crystal ball, and
> it's pretty cloudy at the moment.
>
> Karen
My apologies... I didn't se
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 8:38 pm, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 8:01 am,BobbyRoberts wrote:
> >
> > > there shouldn't be really. The client has a search form and due to
> > > the way they want the search done there are about 40 option checkboxes
On Feb 11, 8:38 pm, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> On Feb 11, 8:01 am,BobbyRoberts wrote:
>
> > there shouldn't be really. The client has a search form and due to
> > the way they want the search done there are about 40 option checkboxes
> > for filtering in about 5 categories. It would have been easie
On Feb 11, 8:01 am, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> there shouldn't be really. The client has a search form and due to
> the way they want the search done there are about 40 option checkboxes
> for filtering in about 5 categories. It would have been easier if a
> filter with IN could have been used but
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
>
> there shouldn't be really. The client has a search form and due to
> the way they want the search done there are about 40 option checkboxes
> for filtering in about 5 categories. It would have been easier if a
> filter with IN could have
there shouldn't be really. The client has a search form and due to
the way they want the search done there are about 40 option checkboxes
for filtering in about 5 categories. It would have been easier if a
filter with IN could have been used but the way the search logic is
setup that is not an o
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
>
> hi gang. For various reasons i've decided to use a raw sql statement
> in my view. Following the example located at
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/sql/, I have a view
> which looks like this:
>
>
> def searchform(reque
hi gang. For various reasons i've decided to use a raw sql statement
in my view. Following the example located at
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/sql/, I have a view
which looks like this:
def searchform(request):
from django.db import connection
...
# a massive sql statem
10 matches
Mail list logo
