Re: pgadmin vs schema migration

2011-02-24 Thread Rainy
On Feb 24, 9:54 am, ggavy wrote: > Thanks. It's good to get a little second opinion. I'm sure I'll make > the switch to migration tools eventually as things become a little > more involved. > > Cheers > gav I think the only possible danger is that you might forget to toggle an option like IS NU

Re: pgadmin vs schema migration

2011-02-24 Thread ggavy
Thanks. It's good to get a little second opinion. I'm sure I'll make the switch to migration tools eventually as things become a little more involved. Cheers gav On Feb 24, 11:58 am, Mike Ramirez wrote: > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 03:48:18 am ggavy wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > >     if

Re: pgadmin vs schema migration

2011-02-24 Thread Mike Ramirez
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 03:48:18 am ggavy wrote: > Hello everyone, > if I have a live app running off a postgres db (containing data) > and I want to make reasonably simple schema (and possibly data > content) changes, are there any dangers in just using pgadmin (e.g > adding a column) a

Re: pgadmin vs schema migration

2011-02-24 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 03:48 -0800, ggavy wrote: > I'd keep my models.py up-to-date with any changes I make > to the database (in case of future uses of the app). I haven't seen > anything online warning me not to do it, but the separation worries me > slightly well, that is the way django does it

pgadmin vs schema migration

2011-02-24 Thread ggavy
Hello everyone, if I have a live app running off a postgres db (containing data) and I want to make reasonably simple schema (and possibly data content) changes, are there any dangers in just using pgadmin (e.g adding a column) as opposed to using some type of migration software, e.g. south. I