Re: possible bug when editing an object: foreign key "_id" part gone (SOLVED)

Benedict Verheyen schreef: > Benedict Verheyen schreef: >> Hi, >> >> i think i might have encountered a possible bug but i'm not sure though. >> Editing an object and leaving a mandatory field empty results in the >> form "forgetting" the foreign keys. It doesn't actually forget but it ommits >>

Re: possible bug when editing an object: foreign key "_id" part gone

Benedict Verheyen schreef: > Hi, > > i think i might have encountered a possible bug but i'm not sure though. > Editing an object and leaving a mandatory field empty results in the > form "forgetting" the foreign keys. It doesn't actually forget but it ommits > the > "_id" part and thus the valu

possible bug when editing an object: foreign key "_id" part gone

Hi, i think i might have encountered a possible bug but i'm not sure though. Editing an object and leaving a mandatory field empty results in the form "forgetting" the foreign keys. It doesn't actually forget but it ommits the "_id" part and thus the values are not displayed on the form. The firs