On 2024-02-08 17:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:04:52 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
[...]
Should I keep this patch 01/12 within the series for v5 or should I
send it separately ?
Doesn't matter much, but perfectionism does say "standalone patch please".
Will do. I plan
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:04:52 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> > The series seems useful but is at v4 without much sign of review
> > activity. I think I'll take silence as assent and shall slam it all
> > into -next and see who shouts at me.
> >
>
> Thanks Andrew for picking it up! Dan just
On 2024-02-08 16:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:49:02 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done
before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following
calls on NULL pointers:
out_cleanup_dax:
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done
> before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following
> calls on NULL pointers:
>
> out_cleanup_dax:
> kill_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
> put_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
>
>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:49:02 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done
> before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following
> calls on NULL pointers:
>
> out_cleanup_dax:
> kill_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
>
Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done
before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following
calls on NULL pointers:
out_cleanup_dax:
kill_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
put_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Alasdair
Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done
before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following
calls on NULL pointers:
out_cleanup_dax:
kill_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
put_dax(pmem->dax_dev);
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Alasdair
