On 20 July 2018 at 00:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:08:52PM +0900, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> But this will only be the case if the accelerator is capable of doing
>> the IV generation and en/decryption of multiple contiguous sectors in
>> a single call. Otherwise, you are jus
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
> On 19 July 2018 at 12:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Jul 2018, at 12:09, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> wrote:
I have only build tested it, so if you make sure that it does not br
Hi Xiongfeng,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on cryptodev/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc5 next-20180719]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com
On 19 July 2018 at 12:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> On 19 Jul 2018, at 12:09, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
>> wrote:
>>> I have only build tested it, so if you make sure that it does not break
>>> anything, please go ahead.
>>
>> I can give it a spin;
On 19 July 2018 at 19:55, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018/7/18 23:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 18 July 2018 at 19:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Xiongfeng Wang
>>> wrote:
I tested the performance of software implemented ciphers before and after
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 07:17:45PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> I think the last iteration was this patch
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1498106510-19793-2-git-send-email-binoy.ja...@linaro.org/
Thanks! I'd got v5 but v6 went AWOL for some reason :(
> 2) If the reason is performance, please provi
Hi,
On 2018/7/19 1:17, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 18/07/18 18:46, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:16:05AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
>>
>>> So we are here again and moving INTERNAL dm-crypt functionality into
>>> cryptoapi.
> (namely TCW and LMK) do much more that IV - they modify encry
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:16:05AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> So we are here again and moving INTERNAL dm-crypt functionality into
> cryptoapi.
> The TCW,LMK IVs generator make sense only for dm-crypt
> for compatible old disk encryption mappings.
> I strongly disagree to move this outside of
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> There seems to be some support for at least essiv(aes) in
> drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_cipher.c, is that compatible with your essiv(*)
> template, or is that something else?
Whatever it is it should be removed. We should not be addin
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Xiongfeng Wang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018/7/19 1:17, Milan Broz wrote:
>> On 18/07/18 18:46, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:16:05AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
>>>
So we are here again and moving INTERNAL dm-crypt functionality into
cryptoapi
10 matches
Mail list logo
