zhangxiaoxu,
> Any progress about the problme?
> Should we disable the write same when stack the different LBA disks?
Yes, please.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
---
libmultipath/blacklist.c | 2 +-
multipath/multipath.conf.5 | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/blacklist.c b/libmultipath/blacklist.c
index 709895e..e0d0279 100644
--- a/libmultipat
When a multipath device fails to get a wwid in pathinfo, it moves to the
INIT_MISSING_UDEV state. After a device in this state sends
retrigger_tries change uevents in check_path(), it moves to the
INIT_FAILED state. However, when check_path() is run on a device in
INIT_FAILED, it can call pathinfo
If multipath fails to get the wwid for a device, and the device is
of an unknown type (pp->bus == SYSFS_BUS_UNDEF), don't send change
events. Instead, assume that the device was not meant to be used
and skip it.
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
---
libmultipath/discov
From: Martin Wilck
LOG_MSG() will dereference pp->mpp. Commit cb5ec664 added a call to
LOG_MSG() before the check for (!pp->mpp) in check_path. This can cause
multipathd to crash. LOG_MSG() should check the fields before dereferencing
them. Make checker_selected() an inline function to allow th
I recently got a bug from a user with a bad property
blacklist_exceptions line, where multipath tried to use a zram device,
which caused multipathd to crash. This patch set fixes that crash, and
then adds some additional safeguards to prevent things like this
happening in the future.
The first pat
Dne 13. 02. 19 v 16:01 Bryn M. Reeves napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:21:52PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
If you have this free space it's surely not a bad thing - but there
are many cases, you can get any free space - majority of filesystems
does not support shrinking - so the only 'free
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:21:52PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> If you have this free space it's surely not a bad thing - but there
> are many cases, you can get any free space - majority of filesystems
> does not support shrinking - so the only 'free' space you can
> get is by adding new storage
Hi
Dne 12. 02. 19 v 23:36 John Stoffel napsal(a):
"Zdenek" == Zdenek Kabelac writes:
Zdenek> Dne 10. 02. 19 v 22:58 John Stoffel napsal(a):
Zdenek> The old dm mirror works differently then new dm raid - so if
Zdenek> you have an old one present/running (i.e. LVM mirrored volume)
Zdenek> usin
unlikely has already included in IS_ERR(),
so just remove redundant unlikely annotation.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index 457200ca6287..f1ab81
unlikely has already included in IS_ERR(),
so just remove redundant unlikely annotation.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu
---
drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c
b/dri
unlikely has already included in IS_ERR(),
so just remove redundant unlikely annotation.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu
---
drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
index 0ce04e5b4af
12 matches
Mail list logo
