Hi Steffen,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc3 next-20190807]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Steffen
Hi Steffen,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc3 next-20190807]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Steffen
Ming,
>> + .cleanup_rq = scsi_cleanup_rq,
>> .busy = scsi_mq_lld_busy,
>> .map_queues = scsi_map_queues,
>> };
>
> This one is a cross-tree thing, either scsi/5.4/scsi-queue needs to
> pull for-5.4/block, or do it after both land linus tree.
I'll set up
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:55 PM Steffen Maier wrote:
>
> This was missing from scsi_mq_ops_no_commit of linux-next commit
> 8930a6c20791 ("scsi: core: add support for request batching")
> from Martin's scsi/5.4/scsi-queue or James' scsi/misc.
>
> See also linux-next commit b7e9e1fb7a92 ("scsi: imp
> -Original Message-
> From: Horia Geanta
> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 5:52 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen ; Ard Biesheuvel
>
> Cc: Milan Broz ; Herbert Xu
> ; dm-
> de...@redhat.com; linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [dm-devel] xts fuzz testing and lack of ciphertext stealin
On 8/7/19 7:49 AM, Steffen Maier wrote:
Hi James, Martin, Paolo, Ming,
multipathing with linux-next is broken since 20190723 in our CI.
The patches fix a memleak and a severe dh/multipath functional regression.
It would be nice if we could get them to 5.4/scsi-queue and also next.
>
I would ha
On 07/08/19 16:49, Steffen Maier wrote:
> Hi James, Martin, Paolo, Ming,
>
> multipathing with linux-next is broken since 20190723 in our CI.
> The patches fix a memleak and a severe dh/multipath functional regression.
> It would be nice if we could get them to 5.4/scsi-queue and also next.
>
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 5:40 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org; herb...@gondor.apana.org.au;
> ebigg...@kernel.org;
> a...@redhat.com; snit...@redhat.com; dm-devel@redhat.com; gmazyl...@gmail.com
> Subject
On 6/26/19 7:37 PM, Brian Bunker wrote:
> It has been some time since we updated our PURE FlashArray configuration. The
> Linux vendors that we had been seeing in the field were using very old
> versions
> of multipath-tools, so we haven’t needed to change anything for some time.
> With
> the re
On 7/26/2019 10:59 PM, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 7/26/2019 1:31 PM, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
>> Ok, find below a patch file that adds your vectors from the specification
>> plus my set of additional vectors covering all CTS alignments combined
>> with the block sizes you desired. Please note though
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 16:52, Pascal Van Leeuwen
wrote:
>
> Ard,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 3:17 PM
> > To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> > Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org; herb...@gondor.apana.org.au;
> > ebigg...@kernel.org;
> > a...@r
Ard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 3:17 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen
> Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org; herb...@gondor.apana.org.au;
> ebigg...@kernel.org;
> a...@redhat.com; snit...@redhat.com; dm-devel@redhat.com; gmazyl...@gmail.com
> S
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:28, Pascal Van Leeuwen
wrote:
>
> Ard,
>
> I've actually been following this discussion with some interest, as it has
> some relevance for some of the things I am doing at the moment as well.
>
> For example, for my CTS implementation I need to crypt one or two
> seperate
On 2019/08/06 10:06, Dmitry Fomichev wrote:
> dm-zoned is observed to lock up or livelock in case of hardware
> failure or some misconfiguration of the backing zoned device.
>
> This patch adds a new function in the target code that checks the
> status of the backing device request queue. If it go
On 2019/08/06 10:06, Dmitry Fomichev wrote:
> Some errors are ignored in the I/O path during queueing chunks
> for processing by chunk works. Since at least these errors are
> transient in nature, it should be possible to retry the failed
> incoming commands.
>
> The fix -
>
> Errors that can hap
On 2019/08/06 10:06, Dmitry Fomichev wrote:
> There are several places in reclaim code where errors are not
> propagated to the main function, dmz_reclaim(). This function
> is responsible for unlocking zones that might be still locked
> at the end of any failed reclaim iterations. As the result,
>
On 2019/08/06 8:56, Dmitry Fomichev wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem in dm-kcopyd that may leave jobs in
> complete queue indefinitely in the event of backing storage failure.
>
> This behavior has been observed while running 100% write file fio
> workload against an XFS volume created on top o
On 07/08/2019 07:50, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of instantiating a separate cipher to perform the encryption
> needed to produce the IV, reuse the skcipher used for the block data
> and invoke it one additional time for each block to encrypt a zero
> vector and use the output as the IV.
>
> F
Ard,
I've actually been following this discussion with some interest, as it has
some relevance for some of the things I am doing at the moment as well.
For example, for my CTS implementation I need to crypt one or two
seperate blocks and for the inside-secure driver I sometimes need to do
some s
19 matches
Mail list logo
