On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:34?AM Jan Kara wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> this is a v3 of the patch series which implements the idea of
> blkdev_get_by_*()
v4?
> calls returning bdev_handle which is then passed to blkdev_put() [1]. This
> makes the get and put calls for bdevs more obviously matching and a
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:04:08 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:03:45 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:04:01 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:03:36 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:03:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexi
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> > Hi Mikulas,
> >
> > many thanks for reporting this issue and finding a solution.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:53:55PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > I was evaluating whet
Hi Yureka,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:08:55PM +0200, Yureka wrote:
> #regzbot introduced: 7bcb2c99f8ed
>
> I am running the NixOS distribution cross-compiled from x86_64 to a Marvell
> Armada 388 armv7 SoC.
>
> I am not getting expected speeds when reading/writing on my encrypted hard
> drive wi