Re: [dm-devel] Changes in DM_MULTIPATH_DEVICE_PATH in multipath-tools 0.7.7

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
that creates them, and maybe dedicated consumers. > IOW, there is no "API" or standard describing how rule sets from > different packages maintained by different people should interact. I don't know. I think I noticed some rules files using a convention of prefixing 'private' variables with _. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[dm-devel] Changes in DM_MULTIPATH_DEVICE_PATH in multipath-tools 0.7.7

2018-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
path -u to behave more like it used to. It could just print *nothing* if the device is not a valid multipath one, for instance (which should result in the device property not being set at all, just like the old behaviour). Or it could print this: DM_MULTIPATH_DEVICE_PATH="" though I'm