Yes, it is. New patch is as follows:
We got a NULL pointer exception when testing the two concurrent
"vgchange -ay -K ".
panic call trace:
PID: 25992 TASK: 883cd7d23500 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "vgchange"
#0 [883cd743d600] machine_kexec at 81038fa9
001 [883cd743d660] crash_ke
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:59:13PM +0800, monty_pa...@sina.com wrote:
> All that we need do is to ensure pool_target registering ops
> is the last ops in dm_thin_init.
Any other targets wrong too? cache? multipath? snapshot?
Alasdair
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https
We got a NULL pointer exception when testing the two concurrent
"vgchange -ay -K ".
panic call trace:
PID: 25992 TASK: 883cd7d23500 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "vgchange"
#0 [883cd743d600] machine_kexec at 81038fa9
001 [883cd743d660] crash_kexec at 810c5992
002 [