Applied.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Bart Van Assche <
bart.vanass...@sandisk.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:59 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 03:56:14PM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > > From: "tang.junhui"
> > >
> > > SIGUSR2 is not
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:59 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 03:56:14PM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > From: "tang.junhui"
> >
> > SIGUSR2 is not blocked by default, it would cause bellow conflict
> > in removing of the last path:
>
> ACK
Hello Christophe,
T
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 03:56:14PM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: "tang.junhui"
>
> SIGUSR2 is not blocked by default, it would cause bellow conflict
> in removing of the last path:
ACK
-Ben
> -
> uevent processing threa
From: "tang.junhui"
SIGUSR2 is not blocked by default, it would cause bellow conflict
in removing of the last path:
-
uevent processing thread | waiter thread
-|---
