On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:04:08PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:04:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> >> exposes the existing upper bound on crypto
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:04:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
>> exposes the existing upper bound on crypto block sizes for VLA removal,
>> and introduces a new check for
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:04:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> exposes the existing upper bound on crypto block sizes for VLA removal,
> and introduces a new check for alignmask (current maximum in the kernel
> is 63 from manual
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
exposes the existing upper bound on crypto block sizes for VLA removal,
and introduces a new check for alignmask (current maximum in the kernel
is 63 from manual inspection of all cra_alignmask settings).
[1]
