Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] segment faulty occured in dm_get_status()

2016-10-18 Thread Christophe Varoqui
Merged. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:51:07AM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > From: "tang.junhui" > > > > Signed-off-by: tang.junhui > > ACK. Obviously we don't want uninitialized pointers. But do you know > what as going on w

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] segment faulty occured in dm_get_status()

2016-10-18 Thread Benjamin Marzinski
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:51:07AM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: "tang.junhui" > > Signed-off-by: tang.junhui ACK. Obviously we don't want uninitialized pointers. But do you know what as going on with the device that caused it to return no target? Was there simply no table loade

[dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] segment faulty occured in dm_get_status()

2016-10-17 Thread tang . junhui
From: "tang.junhui" Signed-off-by: tang.junhui segment faulty occured in dm_get_status(), the call trace is: -- (gdb) bt 0 0x00338ec328a5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 1 0x00338ec3400d in abort () from /lib64/libc