On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 11:28 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > When remove_map() is called, if the multipath device is in a mpvec,
> > it
> > must be removed from it, because the device will be freed. Now that
> > the
> > mpvec is passed as
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:22:45PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 11:28 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > When remove_map() is called, if the multipath device is in a mpvec,
> > > it
> > > must be removed from it, b
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> When remove_map() is called, if the multipath device is in a mpvec,
> it
> must be removed from it, because the device will be freed. Now that
> the
> mpvec is passed as a separate parameter to remove_map(), the
> purge_vec
> parameter
When remove_map() is called, if the multipath device is in a mpvec, it
must be removed from it, because the device will be freed. Now that the
mpvec is passed as a separate parameter to remove_map(), the purge_vec
parameter is redundant. It was only used by coalesce_paths(), since the
multipath de
