Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

2021-11-05 Thread jav...@javigon.com
On 04.11.2021 15:37, Keith Busch wrote: On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:32:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I also wonder if it would be useful (since we're already having a > discussion elsewhere about data integrity syscalls

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

2021-11-05 Thread Keith Busch
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:32:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > I also wonder if it would be useful (since we're already having a > > discussion elsewhere about data integrity syscalls for pmem) to be able > > to call this

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

2021-11-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:32:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I also wonder if it would be useful (since we're already having a > discussion elsewhere about data integrity syscalls for pmem) to be able > to call this sort of thing against files? In which case we'd want > another preadv2 flag

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

2021-11-04 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 09:27:50AM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 11/4/2021 12:14 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > What is the actual use case here? > > > > One of the immediate use-case is to use this interface with

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

2021-11-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
What is the actual use case here? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel