On Sat, 2017-05-06 at 15:50 -0400, Phil Turmel wrote:
>
> I think a case can be made for wiping it all during create, for
> consistency with other kernel behaviour. If you allocate memory for
> userspace, or or create a new file on a filesystem with a specific
> size,
> linux goes to some length
On 05/06/2017 06:25 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 03/05/17 15:13, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> There's a difference though - when you're *creating* a completely new
>> device that is an abstraction over existing devices, you (most of the
>> time) expect that new device to be initialized. For those corner
On 05/06/2017 06:25 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 03/05/17 15:13, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> There's a difference though - when you're *creating* a completely new
>> device that is an abstraction over existing devices, you (most of the
>> time) expect that new device to be initialized. For those corner
On 05/06/2017 12:25 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 03/05/17 15:13, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> There's a difference though - when you're *creating* a completely new
>> device that is an abstraction over existing devices, you (most of the
>> time) expect that new device to be initialized. For those corner
On 03/05/17 15:13, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> There's a difference though - when you're *creating* a completely new
> device that is an abstraction over existing devices, you (most of the
> time) expect that new device to be initialized. For those corner cases
> where people do need to keep the old
On 05/03/2017 10:13 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
On 05/02/2017 03:32 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 04/28/2017 05:28 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
On 04/28/2017 07:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
When an array is created the content is not initialized,
so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
On 05/03/2017 10:32 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
On 05/02/2017 03:42 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 04/28/2017 01:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
When an array is created the content is not initialized,
so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
etc on it.
udev will see this and might try to
On 05/02/2017 03:42 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 01:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> When an array is created the content is not initialized,
>> so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
>> etc on it.
>> udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
>>
On 05/02/2017 03:32 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 05:28 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> On 04/28/2017 07:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> When an array is created the content is not initialized,
>>> so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
>>> etc on it.
>>> udev will see
On 04/28/2017 01:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
When an array is created the content is not initialized,
so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
etc on it.
udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
certainly not what is wanted.
So create a mechanism for mdadm
On 04/28/2017 05:28 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
On 04/28/2017 07:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
When an array is created the content is not initialized,
so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
etc on it.
udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
certainly not
On 04/28/2017 07:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> When an array is created the content is not initialized,
> so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
> etc on it.
> udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
> certainly not what is wanted.
>
> So create a
When an array is created the content is not initialized,
so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
etc on it.
udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
certainly not what is wanted.
So create a mechanism for mdadm to communicate with udev to tell
it that
13 matches
Mail list logo
