On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:12:23 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
> with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
> for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup
> semantics.
>
Hi Jens,
can you pull this into 5.19/block? I'd like to send some bio cloning
optimizations for Mike on top of this series.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Hi Jens,
this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup
semantics.
This series moves a few callers away from bio_kmalloc and
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:15:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
> with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
> for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic c
On 3/31/22 10:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This should fix it:
Let's drop this one for 5.18, it's also causing a few conflicts and
would probably be more suited for 5.19 at this point.
--
Jens Axboe
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm
This should fix it:
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/block.c b/fs/squashfs/block.c
index 930eb530fa622..fed99bb3df3be 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/block.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/block.c
@@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ static int copy_bio_to_actor(struct bio *bio,
return copied_bytes;
}
+static void squashfs_bio_free
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:15:46 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
> with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
> for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup
> semantics.
>
On 3/30/22 8:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I just noticed this didn't make it into the 5.18 queue. Which is a
> bit sad as it leaves us with a rather inconsistent bio API in 5.18.
Let me take a look, we might still be able to make it...
--
Jens Axboe
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redha
I just noticed this didn't make it into the 5.18 queue. Which is a
bit sad as it leaves us with a rather inconsistent bio API in 5.18.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Hi Jens,
this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup
semantics.
This series moves a few callers away from bio_kmalloc and
Hi Jens,
this series finishes off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing
with the weirdest member of the famility. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc
for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup
semantics.
This series moves a few callers away from bio_kmalloc and
11 matches
Mail list logo
