Re: [dm-devel] split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2

2020-12-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Jens, can you pick this up for 5.11? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[dm-devel] split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2

2020-12-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Jens, this series resurrects a patch from Martin to properly split the flag indicating a disk has been set read-only by the hardware vs the userspace policy set through the BLKROSET ioctl. Note that the last patch only applies to for-next and not to for-5.11/block. I can hold it back for the

[dm-devel] split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2

2020-11-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Jens, this series resurrects a patch from Martin to properly split the flag indicating a disk has been set read-only by the hardware vs the userspace policy set through the BLKROSET ioctl. This series is based on top of the "merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct v4" series and wo