multipath-tools: improve processing
efficiency for addition and deletion of multipath devices
Hello Tang,
＞ In the second case, we know all events in the sequence have the
＞ same
＞ ＞ WWID in this case I think it would be safe to filter away "remove"
＞ ＞ events by subsequent "add"
Hello Tang,
＞ In the second case, we know all events in the sequence have the
> same
> ＞ WWID; in this case I think it would be safe to filter away "remove"
> ＞ events by subsequent "add" events, ending up with "add path1| add
> ＞ path2| remove path3". But I may be overlooking something here.
>
>
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 11:24 +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for your responsible,
>
> ＞ I'd like the following better for this check. It uses much less cyc
> les.
>
> ＞ static bool
> ＞ can_discard_by_devpath(const char *devpath)
>
> ＞ This would be better readab
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:24:10AM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>Hello Martin,
>
>Thanks for your responsible,
>
>＞ I'd like the following better for this check. It uses much less cycles.
>
>＞ static bool
>＞ can_discard_by_devpath(const char *devpath)
>
>＞ This
