On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> We are using the 4.19.75 stable tree with dm-thin and multi-queue scsi.
> We have been using the 4.19 branch for months without issue; we just
> switched to MQ and we seem to have hit this BUG_ON. Whether or not MQ is
> related to the issue, I don't
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Joe Thornber wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 06:27:09PM +, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > I pvmoved the tmeta to an SSD logical volume (dm-linear) on a non-bcache
> > volume and we got the same trace this morning, so while the tdata still
> > passes through
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 06:27:09PM +, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> I pvmoved the tmeta to an SSD logical volume (dm-linear) on a non-bcache
> volume and we got the same trace this morning, so while the tdata still
> passes through bcache, all meta operations are direct to an SSD. This is
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25 2019 at 2:40pm -0400,
> Eric Wheeler wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are using the 4.19.75 stable tree with dm-thin and multi-queue scsi.
> > We have been using the 4.19 branch for months without issue; we just
> > switched to MQ and
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25 2019 at 2:40pm -0400, Eric Wheeler
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are using the 4.19.75 stable tree with dm-thin and multi-queue scsi.
> > We have been using the 4.19 branch for months without issue; we just
> > switched to MQ and
On Wed, Sep 25 2019 at 2:40pm -0400,
Eric Wheeler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are using the 4.19.75 stable tree with dm-thin and multi-queue scsi.
> We have been using the 4.19 branch for months without issue; we just
> switched to MQ and we seem to have hit this BUG_ON. Whether or not MQ is
>
Hello,
We are using the 4.19.75 stable tree with dm-thin and multi-queue scsi.
We have been using the 4.19 branch for months without issue; we just
switched to MQ and we seem to have hit this BUG_ON. Whether or not MQ is
related to the issue, I don't know, maybe coincidence:
static
