On Jun 13, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2014, at 7:55, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
>> Just a quick reminder here: Postal mail is still going strong, after 100s
>> of years.
>
> I don't know what it's like where you live, but here the only thing that is
> keeping the post offi
On 13 Jun 2014, at 7:55, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Just a quick reminder here: Postal mail is still going strong, after 100s of
> years.
I don't know what it's like where you live, but here the only thing that is
keeping the post office afloat is being paid by advertisers to deliver
unsolicit
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Perhaps I'm oversimplifying, but it has seemed self-evident that you need a
> single identifier that is displayed to the end user and 5322.From is the only
> identifier that even comes close to being the right one.
And that comes from t
On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Terry Zink wrote:
>> Hector Santos wrote:
>>
>>> It is mentioned in Section 6, but the mention there doesn't even say
>>> that it's the DMARC result that's supposed to be recorded. That bit
>>> at least needs to be fixed.
>>>
>>> Anyone else have a comment?
>
>>
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Miles Fidelman
mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>> wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
> My point is that mail is an old protocol and people who
expect that
> it
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
>> Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
>>
>> > My point is that mail is an old protocol and people who expect that
>> > it can be kept going unaltered in its original form serving all the
>> > purposes that it wa
On 6/12/2014 7:57 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Sure, but as soon as the spammers adapt and start spoofing lists, you
need to check the list's signature anyway.
And I don't think customers who sign up for a list will be happy with
losing mail for a month.
RECOMMENDATION:
In principle, the L
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
> My point is that mail is an old protocol and people who expect that
> it can be kept going unaltered in its original form serving all the
> purposes that it was never designed for but have emerged over time
> are going to be upset
John Sweet writes:
> That's not an integration test. It's all automated. The answer you
> want is, "Can I make money now?" This is how you get the
> answer. The DMARC record is only part of the story, whether
> recipients act on it or not is just as important.
Well, for Author Domains publish
