Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect Mail Flows

2014-11-27 Thread José Ferreira
> From: "Franck Martin" > To: "José Ferreira" > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 7:15:38 PM > > opendkim[5120]: 3jnzZZ1h1Lz2pG1f: can't parse From: header value ' > > MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery System)' > > > With DefaultSender set you can overcome this. > > see point

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC and Bounces (was: Indirect Mail Flows)

2014-11-27 Thread Franck Martin
- Original Message - > From: "José Ferreira" > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 3:34:57 AM > Subject: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC and Bounces (was: Indirect Mail Flows) > > >From: "Franck Martin" > >Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:29:35 PM > > > >Therefore it is impor

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect Mail Flows

2014-11-27 Thread Franck Martin
- Original Message - > From: "José Ferreira" > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 4:35:35 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect Mail Flows > Funny you mention it > Postfix doesn't have that issue. It can sign bounces, opendkim rejects the > default From address pr

[dmarc-ietf] DMARC and Bounces (was: Indirect Mail Flows)

2014-11-27 Thread José Ferreira
>From: "Franck Martin" >Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:29:35 PM > >Therefore it is important to read >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-10.1.3 on how to setup SPF to >work with >bounces. > >I know (or have known) several large properties that did not have this setup. >Unfor