On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com
wrote:
I don't think it does. What I was trying to say is that if you already
got an
aligned pass from one method, you're done. It doesn't matter if they other
one gets a DNS error, you already have a definitive result.
On 12/25/2014 6:46 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Although I've already removed the paragraph under discussion, one more
point occurred to me:
There was text in there until recently that required rejection of
messages with multi-valued From: fields. People complained about this,
and so we
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Dave Crocker dcroc...@gmail.com wrote:
One could argue either way about the multi-valued From:, but at least it
has an essential relationship to DMARC, since DMARC evaluates From:. If
DMARC were required to handle multi-valued From:, it would alter DMARC
On December 25, 2014 8:43:29 PM CST, Murray S. Kucherawy
superu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com
wrote:
I don't think it does. What I was trying to say is that if you
already
got an
aligned pass from one method, you're done. It
