On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:14 PM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
Do people concur with this change, or something close to it?
I'm OK with it, but to the meta-question, I realize the practical
issues involved with yanking something out of the production queue,
but in this case I wonder if
Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com writes:
DMARC takes the SPF result and the Mail From as an input
(which in the case of a null Mail From is a synthetic Mail From
built using HELO, but that's just a coincidence). SPF isn't
just a result (pass, fail, etc), it also has a domain and a
On January 21, 2015 5:01:53 PM EST, Franck Martin fra...@peachymango.org
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 9:36:57 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ... and two more tiny nits, while I'm at it
On
On January 21, 2015 5:20:42 PM EST, Anne Bennett a...@encs.concordia.ca wrote:
Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com writes:
DMARC takes the SPF result and the Mail From as an input
(which in the case of a null Mail From is a synthetic Mail From
built using HELO, but that's just a
