Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ideas for list handling

2015-04-10 Thread John R Levine
Stop exaggerating. It is not the case that anywhere near 100% of list managers actually *need* doodads, although a few (covering less than 1% of recipients, I bet) do need them, and many find them attractive. Well, now we're back to arbitrarily close to 100% of list managers can live with

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Updated mandatory tag/conditional signature draft

2015-04-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote: TPA is still on the table for other 3rd party services (invoicing etc), because conditional signatures do nothing for them. I suggest that TPA or ATPS are way too complicated for third party services like

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ideas for list handling

2015-04-10 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
John R Levine writes: Again, Murray and I don't need them but other proposals do. OK, FWIW, I'm only interested in your proposals at the moment. :-) Thanks for the courteous response; I didn't entirely deserve it. ___ dmarc mailing list