Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC ATPS Interop Note

2015-05-12 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Douglas Otis writes: > DMARC being unable to assert the domain I'm not sure what you mean by "assert the domain". AFAICS no new protocol is needed to validate Sender -- SPF and DKIM allow that already, and it's not obvious to me where the big threat is from a misaligned or spoofed Sender. (A B

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC ATPS Interop Note

2015-05-12 Thread Douglas Otis
On 5/11/15 10:28 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > On 5/11/2015 2:56 PM, Douglas Otis wrote: >> >> On 5/10/15 10:08 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Douglas Otis >>> wrote: ATPS included an onerous task for any third-party service likely used on a gratis bas