(chair hat off)
> >Please submit "stuff" that needs to be fixed
> The worst problem is still section 3.1.2.3 which needs to be deleted,
> since most of what it says is wrong, and what little isn't wrong is
> irrelevant.
> RFC 6854 is not about EAI, since an ASCII MUA can create mail with an
> em
On 5/22/2015 11:44 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Franck Martin writes:
> > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull"
> > (3) I would really like to see some provision for reporting to mailbox
> > users when their mail is being discarded
> The email is bounced, not discarded.
Not necessarily.
>It is not wrong, I think you have no practical experience with EAI.
You might want to review these, as well as RFC 6783.
http://www.circleid.com/posts/email_in_the_worlds_languages_part_i/
http://www.circleid.com/posts/email_in_the_worlds_languages_part_ii/
http://www.circleid.com/posts/email_in
