I'm not sure what Hotmail does currently, but it won't matter in the long run because the email infrastructure is moving over to Office 365. The DKIM code there will interpret a v=2 as an invalid signature.
-- Terry -----Original Message----- From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John R Levine Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 8:35 AM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: dmarc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-02 > As John pointed out, RFC6376 requires that the signature not pass for any > "v=" value other than 1. It won't even get as far as considering the "!" > tags. > > He said "most" implementations he checked will conform to that. I thought > it was "all"; perhaps he'd care to elaborate. All the ones that anyone has checked. Since the code for places like Hotmail isn't available, you'd have to send them some v=2 signatures and see what happens. I haven't done that, although I'd be pretty surprised if they interpreted the spec differently from everyone else. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
