Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new internet-drafts related to forwarded email

> On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:07 AM, Tim Draegen wrote: > >> On Oct 16, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Kurt Andersen > > wrote: >> >> Will look forward to feedback from any interested parties. > > Hi Kurt, > > Can you and the editors of these documents review the interoperability issue

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new internet-drafts related to forwarded email

I'll go through (now that the ARC draft is released) and comment on how if relates to the interop topology. --Kurt On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tim Draegen wrote: > On Oct 17, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > > As one of the editors for the interop document, I have already reviewe

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new internet-drafts related to forwarded email

> On Oct 17, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > > As one of the editors for the interop document, I have already reviewed it > :-) Yes! I'm hoping your A.R.C. colleagues will chime in, too. > > The ARC spec is explicitly designed to help preserve authentication results > across multi

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new internet-drafts related to forwarded email

As one of the editors for the interop document, I have already reviewed it :-) The ARC spec is explicitly designed to help preserve authentication results across multi-hop mail transfers in all of the cases where the intermediaries participate. I would like to add a section to the interop document

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new internet-drafts related to forwarded email

> On Oct 16, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > > Will look forward to feedback from any interested parties. Hi Kurt, Can you and the editors of these documents review the interoperability issues doc (now in WG last call): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability