On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Gene Shuman wrote:
> I think its clear that we fail all of these messages. But for signing, we
> need to specify an ordering on these pathological arc headers, as section
> [5.2.1] only applies when you can logically define arc sets. We also
> probably need this
Hello,
This is something of a continuation of my other email wrt section [5.2.1]
of the draft. I've discovered an even larger range of indeterminate cases
wrt to this section, and any attempt to rectify this within the given
framework seems to get fairly messy. Basically, there is a large class
