This might be a non-issue, but we're asking this question specifically
because we've run into an implementation issue within openarc that feels
weird and seems like a matter the WG may want to weigh in on.
Our expectation is that, for any given ARC Set n, AMS[n] would cover AAR[n].
Currently in
I'm normally not a fan of reputation but this may be a case where
reputation might be useful. I'd have to think on this some more.
Mike
On 5/24/2017 6:56 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
So, last year I did add the concept of a dmarc tempfail to our code,
but the main utility of that was to respond
