On 7/15/2017 12:23 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I don't think OpenARC development details are appropriate for the IETF
list, are they?
I agree.
--
HLS
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
We had 6-8 people through the weekend working on various interoperability
things:
- Andreas Schulze was able to obtain openarc.org and has stood up a
forwarder using OpenARC to process the mail both with verification on the
way in and sealing on the way out, but the AMS which are generate
We had 6-8 people through the weekend working on various interoperability
things:
- Andreas Schulze was able to obtain openarc.org and has stood up a
forwarder using OpenARC to process the mail both with verification on the
way in and sealing on the way out, but the AMS which are generate
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> Status reports are great list material. I don't think it's useful for mic
> time. Unless something specific about OpenARC is germane to the draft(s), I
> feel we have plenty of other stuff to discuss during face time.
I'll definitely
Status reports are great list material. I don't think it's useful for mic
time. Unless something specific about OpenARC is germane to the draft(s),
I feel we have plenty of other stuff to discuss during face time.
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Barry Leiba
wrote:
> > Why is OpenARC's status
The DMARC and DCRUP working groups share the morning session on
Thursday, with DKIM scheduled from 9:30 to 10:30, and DCRUP scheduled
to start at 11:00.
To avoid having people hanging out for half an hour, we have reduced
the time between the sessions to 10 minutes. The DCRUP session will
now sta
> I don't think OpenARC development details are appropriate for the IETF list,
> are they?
For extended discussion, perhaps not, but it speaks to running code.
If discussion of implementations can lead to a better understanding of
the spec, or fixes to the spec, or whatever, tant mieux.
Barry
__
> Why is OpenARC's status an IETF agenda item?
Because someone in the working group asked for a summary, and I
thought it would be a quick and easy agenda item. If you object to
giving a status report in the session, I'll strike it.
Barry
___
dmarc ma
