On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> While I have a number of issues with the details of the proposal, I'll
> tackle those in another thread. The fundamental problem that I have with
> the whole "experiment" approach is that it is something like throwing a
> baseball into a
Omitting stylistic nits for now:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> 16 Experimental Considerations
>
> [[ NOTE TO WORKING GROUP: Should this section be for the IESG only to be
> removed by the document editor, or should it stay with the document as long
> as it’s experimental?
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> Replace 5.1.1 with:
>
> 5.1.1. ptypes and properties for arc-info
>
> Certain information pertinent to ascertaining message disposition can be
> lost in transit when messages are handled by intermediaries. For example,
> failing DKIM signatures
