On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Dave Crocker wrote:
Not at all. The point of a standard is to say here is what you do if
you want to interoperate. Trying to figure out how to recover when
someone else doesn't follow the spec is a fool's errand, since there
are more ways to misimplement a spec than any of
On 6/29/2018 8:13 AM, John Levine wrote:
In article
you write:
Anything that comes close to 'do whatever you want with this
information' demonstrates NON-standardization.
Not at all. The point of a standard is to say here is what you do if
you want to interoperate. Trying to figure out how
On 6/29/2018 11:13 AM, John Levine wrote:
In article
you write:
Anything that comes close to 'do whatever you want with this
information' demonstrates NON-standardization.
Not at all. The point of a standard is to say here is what you do if
you want to interoperate. Trying to figure out ho
In article
you write:
>> Anything that comes close to 'do whatever you want with this
>> information' demonstrates NON-standardization.
Not at all. The point of a standard is to say here is what you do if
you want to interoperate. Trying to figure out how to recover when
someone else doesn't f
