On 10/24/2018 5:18 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:30 AM Hector Santos
What it should do is:
1) It should use a 1st party signature using d=dmarc.ietf.org
to match the new author domain dmarc.ietf.org
2) It should has hash bind the X-Original
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:30 AM Hector Santos wrote:
> The rewrite should be the last thing to consider, and if it does
> rewrite, it should replace the original author domain strong policy
> with its own strong policy.
>
> For example, the ietf.org mailing list has begun to rewrite and it
> r
Tim Draegen has requested publication of draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-03 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the DMARC working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis/
___
dmarc mailing li
In article ,
Seth Blank wrote:
>ARC inherits all the DKIM mechanisms by reference. So whateverâs valid for
>DKIM (the list you provided) is whatâs valid for ARC.
>> DKIM, as updated by the DCRUP work, has two valid crypto algorithms:
>>
>> rsa-sha256
>> ed25119-sha256
I would defer working
