On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:15 AM Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
> Both of these are indeed normative in usage, but I was under the
> impression that one could not refer to I-Ds as normative.
>
At least 7601bis will be an RFC at the same time as this one is, if not
sooner. I don't know what the
I concur. This is an important work item for the group, and fits cleanly
into Phase 3 of our charter.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:42 AM Kurt Andersen wrote:
> I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00 into our work
> queue. It
On 10/25/2018 1:42 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00 into our work
queue. It aligns with our charter already.
--Kurt Andersen
+1
I would also suggest to use the document proposal (and
I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00 into our work
queue. It aligns with our charter already.
--Kurt Andersen
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:52 AM Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
> I've reviewed recent changes and they look like an improvement over
> earlier versions. I have a few minor comments:
>
> 1) I think several references need to be reclassified as Normative:
>
> [I-D-7601bis]
>Kucherawy,
On 10/25/2018 7:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
2) I am glad that broken examples from Appendix B were removed, but I
would like to have some examples in the document. Is somebody working
on generating these?
+1.
Especially examples of DMARC.
--
HLS
The IESG has received a request from the Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting & Conformance WG (dmarc) to consider the following document: -
'Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few
I've reviewed recent changes and they look like an improvement over
earlier versions. I have a few minor comments:
1) I think several references need to be reclassified as Normative:
[I-D-7601bis]
Kucherawy, M., "Message Header Field for Indicating
Message
Changed milestone "Complete Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) protocol
spec", resolved as "Done".
URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/about/
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Hi,
I've started IETF LC on the document, as my comments are really minor:
1) I am not sure that deleted IANA registry descriptions (when compared
to RFC 7601) is the best way, considering that this document obsoletes
RFC 7601. I think it would be better to just keep the text and add a
10 matches
Mail list logo
