A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol
Authors : Kurt Ande
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Brandon Long wrote:
If it does work, I'd be a surprised. Most likely, it'll fail validation
prior to full parsing (we extract the i= first, and only fully parse all
the k=v pairs later).
Also, does that mean you have to use the same algorithm in both the AMS and
AS for a giv
On Monday, November 05, 2018 01:06:13 PM Brandon Long wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:13 AM Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 18:09 John R Levine >> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> >> >> I mean ARC as it's implemented now, not in our multi-signing draft.
> >> >
>
I think MSK’s text with Kitterman’s caveat cleanly carved out for
interoperability regressions is the optimal charter update.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 00:14 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On November 5, 2018 3:21:15 AM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)"
> wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Scott Kitte
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:13 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:25 PM Scott Kitterman
> wrote:
>
>> Having reviewed the thread that Kurt pointed me to, it seemed like this
>> is
>> something only one person wanted. It didn't appear to have a lot of push
>> behind it.
>>
>
>
No objection here
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:07 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> No objection. I've already got opinions ready to go when it gets
> accepted. :-)
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM Barry Leiba
> wrote:
>
>> > I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
>> https://tools.ietf.o
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:25 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't think it's something we should delay on. In my, admittedly
> limited,
> experience with these things, once something is in an experimental version
> of
> an RFC, then it 'has' to be preserved in the name of interoperability with
> t
No objection. I've already got opinions ready to go when it gets
accepted. :-)
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
> > I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00
> > into our work queue. It aligns with our charter al
