In article you write:
>Hello John,
>
>DMARC reports for p=none are not supposed to be useful, as they do not depend
>on the policy.
Sorry, but that assertion is completely wrong. Please see RFC 7489.
>If the question is about how to get reports on failing DKIM validation only on
I completely disagree.
I have p=none and I find the reports very useful.
The policy is about action taken, not DMARC results, which is what feedback is
about.
Scott K
On February 6, 2019 10:11:55 PM UTC, "Дилян Палаузов"
wrote:
>Hello John,
>
>DMARC reports for p=none are not supposed to be
Hello John,
DMARC reports for p=none are not supposed to be useful, as they do not depend
on the policy.
If the question is about how to get reports on failing DKIM validation only on
unexpectedly smashed messages, then I
recall the last discussion on ietf-d...@ietf.org:
- this is not DMARC,
