Dear Doug / Damy
There is no direct connection between pEp and DMARC, as pEp is not relying
on centralized infrastructure.
cheers
Bernie
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Doug Foster wrote:
Can one of you elaborate on the potential connection between PeP and DMARC,
or more generally, the connection be
In article <002a01d4de81$18ac27b0$4a047710$@bayviewphysicians.com> you write:
>Can one of you elaborate on the potential connection between PeP and DMARC,
>or more generally, the connection beteen PeP and spam filtering?
I presume that PeP would make spam filtering much harder since the filters c
Can one of you elaborate on the potential connection between PeP and DMARC,
or more generally, the connection beteen PeP and spam filtering?
-Original Message-
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DAMY gustavo
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 2:03 PM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc
Very useful links Bernie, thanks for the info.
I wonder if this working group will eventually will make reference to the
concept of PeP protocol to reinforce the usage of DMARC you are mentioning
below?
Best Regards
Gustavo Damy
-Original Message-
From: Bernie Hoeneisen
Sent: Mon
On 3/18/2019 3:48 PM, Michael Davis wrote:
If a sender's IP is in SPF, so SPF passes; and the applied DKIM signature
is successfully decrypted, so DKIM passes; what good is checking alignment
and rejecting a message? I have had Adobe and Cloudflare automated system
emails rejected based on those
