A while back there was a request for reports on nits pertaining to the
specification.
Here is one which I've circulated briefly to some folks recently in
person, but I'm not sure how well received it will be here, as a
plausible inclusion in the spec.
The suggestion: provide guidelines on
Hello Ken,
effectively I proposed handling p=reject and p=quarantine the same way. Shall
I read in your answer, that failed DMARC
validation is weighted differently in the overall spam evaluation, for p=reject
and for p=quarantine?
> A use case for p=quarantine is that when deploying DMARC
Nope, I mean 2 different things.
1. Why quarantine is useful (with pct=0).
For example this mailing list (dmarc@ietf.org) performs From rewrite
(aka From munging), e.g. dubro...@corp.mail.ru is replaced with
dubrovin=40corp.mail...@dmarc.ietf.org. It's because corp.mail.ru has a
strict DMARC
