Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

2019-11-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:30 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:54 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> On Wed 07/Aug/2019 17:16:29 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> > >> >> If the definition of ptype smtp were "a parameter of the SMTP session >> used >> >> to relay the mes

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

2019-11-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:22 PM Dave Crocker wrote: > > 1. The change to DMARC should be limited to permitting the query for the > > organization domain to be anywhere in the DNS tree, including a TLD. > > Within DMARC this would not look like 'extra' mechanism. > > > > 2. The mechanism that proce

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

2019-11-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:54 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Wed 07/Aug/2019 17:16:29 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > >> If the definition of ptype smtp were "a parameter of the SMTP session > used > >> to relay the message" it would be perfect. I'd propose that > policy.iprev > >> be de