(just a fan of
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levine-dbound-dns-03.txt)
Don't miss https://github.com/jrlevine/bound
I found and fixed a bunch of bugs in the spec when I implemented it. Who
knew that could happen?
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM John Levine wrote:
In article you
+1
Tim
(just a fan of
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levine-dbound-dns-03.txt)
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article q...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >So we could decide on doing a combinatory of #3 and #1, with the right
> >mechanisms.
>
> Publishing a list of
In article
you
write:
>So we could decide on doing a combinatory of #3 and #1, with the right
>mechanisms.
Publishing a list of PSD superdomains in the DNS is pretty trivial
using my dbound scheme, and should typically find out whether any name
needs a PSD check with one DNS query. The total z
Scott
Instead of thinking one must choose between a locally consumed registry and
a lookup service, why not both?
In the land of DNSOP we put out RFC7706 which talks about running a copy of
the root Nameservers locally to
speed lookups. This seems to be so highly useful that we're just finished
W
