It occurs to me on review that this draft refers to Organizational Domain,
and probably some other terms, without defining them or expressly importing
them from RFC7489. In particular Section 2.3 refers to the OD with no
prior definition.
Maybe: Insert a new Section 2.2 (pushing others down) that
I'm not the current author of any DMARC documents in any case, and I'm
happy to leave DMARCbis to new blood.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:01 AM Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
> Hi Hector,
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
> > Congratulations. The IETF will be enhanced with your new
If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a "Public
suffix" is
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8499#page-28
Which could assist in the Public Suffix Domain definition here.
If this makes sense, I can offer some suggested text
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:06 PM Murray S. Kuchera
I'm ambivalent at this stage about whether this makes it into the PSD
document, but please someone do add it to the queue for DMARCbis.
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a
> "Public suffix" is
> https://tool
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a
> "Public suffix" is
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8499#page-28
>
> Which could assist in the Public Suffix Domain definition here.
> If this makes sense, I can offer so
On Saturday, February 29, 2020 2:59:44 PM EST Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
> > If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a
> > "Public suffix" is
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8499#page-28
> >
> > Which could assist i
On Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:30:59 AM EST Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:02 AM Craig Schwartz wrote:
> > First, while I know you've said the needs of external actors won't weigh
> > on your decision about moving forward, I would like to mention that
> > having a stable
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> I think the only thing that might be missing is explicitly importing the
> term
> organizational domain from RFC 7489. I think it wouldn't hurt to add it,
> but
> I don't think it's needed. As early as the second sentence of the
> introdu
