In article
you write:
>> Consider: From f...@bogus.bogus.bogus.bogus.bogus...bogus.bogus.example.com
>>
>Yeah, I'm familiar with the nature of the attack. But based on what
>amounts to the hallway track, it feels like the perspective of the DNS
>community these days is that the currently deploy
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:49 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 3/11/2020 8:36 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> Since we're mentioning a tree walk here, I believe we are ripe for a
> reopening of that debate.
>
> That's a shame. Besides created additional general cost, it creates an
> attack vector.
>
The IESG has received a request from the Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting & Conformance WG (dmarc) to consider the following document: -
'DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)'
as Experimental RFC
Th
