Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:28 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:12 AM Дилян Палаузов > wrote: > >> I have not read the thread “Ticket #28 - Failure report mail loops”. >> > > Thanks, and apologies to the group; I should've checked for an open ticket > on this topic first.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 1:22 AM Steven M Jones wrote: > >> On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> > >> > How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? >> >> The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the wild >> should

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Thu 14/Jan/2021 16:24:33 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 1:22 AM Steven M Jones wrote: On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: 3) always generate forensic reports as the null sender, and specify that forensic reports should never be generated in response to t

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:12 AM Дилян Палаузов wrote: > I have not read the thread “Ticket #28 - Failure report mail loops”. > Thanks, and apologies to the group; I should've checked for an open ticket on this topic first. This one recommends rate limiting rather than simpler "don't" type guida

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 1:22 AM Steven M Jones wrote: > On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > > How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? > > The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the wild > should be asked, if only to document that it was asked

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Hello, Am Donnerstag, dem 14.01.2021 um 01:22 -0800 schrieb Steven M Jones: > On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > > How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? > > The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the > wild > should be asked, if only to d

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Juri Haberland
On 14.01.21 10:22, Steven M Jones wrote: > On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> >> How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? > > The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the wild > should be asked, if only to document that it was asked and answered. S

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

2021-01-14 Thread Steven M Jones
On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the wild should be asked, if only to document that it was asked and answered. See prior "this is a vanishingly small number who ca