Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists

2021-10-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
This assumes that email which transits a list will fail DMARC evaluation. While that's the most common case, it's nowhere near universal. This isn't something that can be reduced to a simple truth table and optimized to a single solution. Scott K On October 15, 2021 10:36:13 PM UTC, Douglas F

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists

2021-10-15 Thread Douglas Foster
To be completely clear about Murray’s concern: There are three possible strategies for lists to handle postings from DMARC-enforcing subscriber domains: - Never rewrite From - Conditional – rewrite From if required by evaluator - Always rewrite From Similarly, there

[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 112

2021-10-15 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Barry Leiba, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. dmarc Session 1 (1:00 requested) Tuesday, 9 November 2021, Session III 1600-1800 Room Name: Room 2 size: 502 ---

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists

2021-10-15 Thread John Levine
It appears that Baptiste Carvello said: >Now, I'm skeptical of your solution. First, I don't think 100% >deliverability at all times is a hard requirement. ... Since 100% deliverability at all times does not and cannot exist, it's just as well. R's, John _

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists

2021-10-15 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Hi, On Wed 13/Oct/2021 15:35:52 +0200 Baptiste Carvello wrote: First, I don't think 100% deliverability at all times is a hard requirement. That statement is wrong. I experienced random deliverability when I thoughtlessly enabled ADSP in August 2010[*]. I can testify that deliverability