On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Ken O'Driscoll wrote:
Bis means "again", in this case it refers to the next iteration of the DMARC
specification. It's an IETF naming convention, nothing to do with DMARC or the working
group specifically.
It's latin for "twice". The French use it for street addresses.
Bis means "again", in this case it refers to the next iteration of the DMARC
specification. It's an IETF naming convention, nothing to do with DMARC or the
working group specifically.
Ken.
> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Damian Lukowski
> Sent: Monday 20 June 2022 12:
I have not found an explanation anywhere.
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
On Sun 19/Jun/2022 18:08:57 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
That seems like a pessimal way to make things interoperate: use one of
an unknown set of algorithms ...
Given that we're already working in an environment where it's unlikely that
everyone's working from a common version of the PSL, I don't
On Sat 18/Jun/2022 15:47:47 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
The code to switch from PSL based organizational domain to tree walk based is
trivial. I think any marginal cost associated with implementing it or not
will be in the noise compared to the overall cost of designing, coding,
testing, and de
